Data convention for forcing data
The table below provides the list of variables needed to force
land-surface schemes. It is expected that all land-surface scheme
inter-comparisons within GLASS will provide
these forcing variables in a netCDF
file. The data sets of past projects will also be archived at a
central location in this format.This should ensure that the work
needed to run the land-surface scheme for an inter-comparison will be
kept to a minimum and that past expertise is preserved.
It was chosen in this list of variable to separate the Northward and
Eastward wind as in future we my encounter parameterization of surface
turbulence which take wind direction into account. To avoid problems
of past inter-comparison projects with the separation of precipitation
into rainfall and snowfall it was chosen to provide these two
variables separately instead of precipitation only.
The choice of units, sign convention and rank of the data are described above.
As a general rule fluxes are averaged over the time-step of the
forcing data. The fluxes need to be conserved when a time
interpolation is applied before the data is fed to the land-surface
scheme. Other variables on the contrary should be instantaneous
samples in order to capture well the diurnal cycle. This obviously
only applies if the time sampling is high enough for the instantaneous
variables to be representative of the time interval. For this table,
variables which will be provided as averages are in red
The
expected range of values for the forcing variables is provided and will be
checked when the netCDF is produced.
Variable |
Description |
Definition |
Units |
Sign (direction of positive
values) |
Wind_N |
Near surface northward wind component |
Northward wind measured at reference levels near the surface (3D
variable). |
m/s |
Northward |
Wind_E |
Near surface eastward wind component |
Eastward wind measured at reference
levels near the surface (3D
variable). |
m/s |
Eastward |
|
A simplification is possible if only the module of the wind is available. |
Rainf |
Rainfall rate |
Average total rainfall over a time step of the forcing
data. |
kg/m2s |
downward |
|
Sub-grid rainfall information |
|
|
|
Snowf |
Snowfall rate |
Average total snowfall over a time step of forcing
data. |
kg/m2s |
downward |
|
Sub-grid snowfall information |
|
|
|
Tair |
Near surface air temperature |
Temperature measured at reference levels near the surface (3D
variable) |
K |
|
Qair |
Near surface specific humidity |
Specific humidity measured at reference levels near the surface
(3D
variable) |
kg/kg |
|
PSurf |
Surface pressure |
Pressure measured at the surface |
Pa |
|
SWdown |
Surface incident shortwave radiation |
Incident radiation in the shortwave part of the spectrum averaged
over the time step of the forcing data |
W/m2 |
downward |
LWdown |
Surface incident longwave radiation |
Incident longwave radiation averaged over the time step of the
forcing data |
W/m2 |
downward |
CO2air |
Near surface CO2 concentration |
The partial pressure of CO2 concentration at the
atmospheric reference level (3D
variable). |
ppmv |
|
Information on the sub-grid variability of atmospheric forcing needs
to be provided to the land-surface schemes if possible. These
variables pose problems as they are viewed differently in the
observational and modelling communities. For instance, rainfall can be
separated into a convective and a large scale components in
atmospheric models. Some land-surface schemes will use this
information. On the other hand from observations it is easier to
obtain spatial variance. As atmospheric models will refine their
physical processes they will evolve towards quantities much closer to
the ones obtained from observations.
It is thus proposed here to allow for both solution and to encourage
modelling centers to improve their description of the sub-grid
variability of atmospheric variables.
Convective vs large-scale precipitation
The variables Rainf_LS (Snowf_LS) and Rainf_C (Snowf_C) allow
specification of the sub-grid characteristics of both liquid and solid
precipitation. The distinction between stratiform and convective
precipitation is somewhat arbitrary and is no longer valid in many
GCMS. However, this distinction serves as a standard until a
consensus can be reached on a more representative approach. The total
precipitation (Rainf, Snowf) is equal to the sum of the large-scale
and convective components and can be specified in lieu of these
components.
Variable |
Description |
Definition |
Units |
Sign (direction of positive
values) |
LSRainf |
Large-scale rainfall rate |
Average large-scale rainfall over a time step of the forcing
data. |
kg/m2s |
|
CRainf |
Convective Rainfall rate |
Average of convective rainfall over a time step of the forcing
data. |
kg/m2s |
|
CSnowf |
Convective snowfall rate |
Average of the convective snowfall over a time step of forcing
data. |
kg/m2s |
|
LSSnowf |
Large-scale snowfall rate |
Average of the large-scale snowfall over a time step of forcing
data. |
kg/m2s |
|
Rainfall and snowfall spatial variance
Until a better solution is found the spacial variance is proposed.
Variable |
Description |
Definition |
Units |
Sign (direction of positive
values) |
SVRainf |
Rainfall rate |
Spatial variance of average total rainfall over a time step of the forcing
data. |
(kg/m2s)2 |
|
SVSnowf |
Snowfall rate |
Spatial variance of average total snowfall over a time step of forcing
data. |
(kg/m2s)2 |
|
The are data sets where only the module of wind is available. In this
case one could set one of the wind components to zero and write the
data into the other. This can generate a significant volume of
unneeded data. To solve this problem it is proposed to introduce a
wind module variable which would replace Wind_W and Wind_E.
In order to avoid having to change the code from one case to another
a sample code section is proposed which allows to keep all the
flexibility in the software.
Variable |
Description |
Definition |
Units |
Sign (direction of positive
values) |
Wind |
Near surface module of the wind |
Wind speed measured at a reference levels near the surface (3D
variable). |
m/s |
|
Ancillary data
Inter-comparison projects may also wish to provide to the
participating land-surface schemes variables which describe the
physical characteristics of the surface. It is not as easy to provide
a convention for them as they may come with different time sampling
rates. This list of variables will probably also change from one
inter-comparison to the other as they depend on the scientific
objectives of the project.Indeed as all schemes can determine the
values for these variables by themselves (At least when they are
running coupled to a GCM) it is a legitimate position not to provide
them at all. Nevertheless, it is recommended that if they are
provided, they be provided in the netCDF format using the meta-data
convention described above.The variables which could be included are
the following :
- Vegetation type(s) (possible 3D variable)
- Vegetation cover fraction
- Vegetation Albedo
- Leaf Area Index
- Height of vegetation
- Surface roughness length (momentum, heat and moisture)
- Greenness or green leaf fraction
- Soil information (texture, composition, depth, albedo, etc.)
- Solar zenith angle (It is expected that a standard program to compute it
will be provided in the bazaar).
- Upper drainage area
- Fractional area of grid cells (i.e.area within a hydrologic unit; land/sea boundary)
- Irrigation fluxes
Last
modified: Thu May 4 23:38:11 WEST 2000